Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
See King Ledley's West Ham Review - "A chance to play good football again" | Dub has been reviewing the new album from The Doves - Read more...

The home of all discussion regarding our favourite club, Tottenham Hotspur.

You're currently viewing the JSG forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access bonus forums and SPURS material, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join the JSG community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Waddle: Walcott Doesn`t Have A Football Brain
Topic Started: Mar 4 2010, 08:37 PM (1,791 Views)
Fitz
.

WADDLE: WALCOTT DOESN`T HAVE A FOOTBALL BRAIN
Posted 04/03/10 13:58EmailPrintSave


Former England winger Chris Waddle has launched a savage attack on Theo Walcott.


According to Waddle, a pundit for BBC Radio Five Live for England's win over Egypt on Wednesday night, the Arsenal forward does not possess a football brain and hasn't developed his game since his 2006 transfer from Southampton to the Emirates.


It's almost as if Waddle has been reading a copy of F365 from a year ago.


"People keep saying he's young but Wayne Rooney understood the game at 16, 17," Waddle told The Times. "I've never seen any difference in Walcott since he was at Southampton and broke into the team at a very young age.


"I've never seen him develop. He just doesn't understand the game for me - where to be running, when to run inside a full back, when to just play a one-two. It's all off the cuff.


"I just don't think he's got a football brain and he's going to have problems. Let's be honest, good defenders would catch him offside every time. I just don't know whether he studies the game, learns the game, or what. He's at a great club where they play fantastic football week-in, week-out, and I'm just surprised he's never developed his game.


"I'm surprised Walcott was in the squad. He doesn't play a lot of football, he hasn't done anything. he hasn't done anything for a long time and I think Croatia was a one-off."

http://msn.football365.com/story/0,17033,8652_6002652,00.html
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Chicagospur
Member Avatar
Bound for the Champion's League, I hope!

I :wub: Chris Waddle - dodgy mullet, diamond lights and all! :tup:
COME ON YOU SPURS!!!!!

Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Coq
Member Avatar
GDS

walcott = the worst player ever
REDCUNT OUT
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ottawa_John
Member Avatar


What prompted Chris Waddle to say this? Did Walcott play against Eygpt and a bolognaise of things, or is there something else?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Scarf
Member Avatar
Baby come back
Fulham
Ottawa_John
Mar 4 2010, 09:10 PM
What prompted Chris Waddle to say this? Did Walcott play against Eygpt and a bolognaise of things, or is there something else?
He's not that good a player. He's better than a lot, but worse than a lot more :D
----------------
Ricky Villa
 
BAE > BALE

:cry:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Coq
Member Avatar
GDS

waddle was commentating on radio 5 - he just gave his opinion
REDCUNT OUT
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ottawa_John
Member Avatar


Walcott went to the last World Cup, some said as Judas Sol's companion (not nice). I assume Chris Waddle feels, as does Scarf, that he should not go to South Africa?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Scarf
Member Avatar
Baby come back
Fulham
Ottawa_John
Mar 4 2010, 09:31 PM
Walcott went to the last World Cup, some said as Judas Sol's companion (not nice). I assume Chris Waddle feels, as does Scarf, that he should not go to South Africa?
I dont think he deserves to go, but nor do a lot of current players!

On form this season SWP hasnt done shit, and he's actually a worse player than Walcott - but he certainly didnt show that last night

Lennon and Rooney are the only two players that 1) deserve to be in the England squad without question, and 2) can actually perform.
----------------
Ricky Villa
 
BAE > BALE

:cry:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Klinsmann18
Member Avatar
Suck Dubs Balls!!

SWP is far better than Walcott. That just highlights how shit Walcott is though, not that SWP is good :D
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hwt8a3y28qo
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Scarf
Member Avatar
Baby come back
Fulham
Hmm perhaps, I think SWP is just a lucky player. All his moves and shots are just deflections :D
----------------
Ricky Villa
 
BAE > BALE

:cry:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Klinsmann18
Member Avatar
Suck Dubs Balls!!

scarfboy
Mar 4 2010, 09:46 PM
Hmm perhaps, I think SWP is just a lucky player. All his moves and shots are just deflections :D
But at least he tries other things besides the trick I learn't at school lunchtime as a 7 year old, of knocking it one side of an opposing player and running around the other side.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hwt8a3y28qo
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Scarf
Member Avatar
Baby come back
Fulham
:rofl:

I can do that :smoke:
----------------
Ricky Villa
 
BAE > BALE

:cry:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Nasri_8
Member Avatar
Andrei Arsharvin

Man lands on the moon?
Posted Image Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Nasri_8
Member Avatar
Andrei Arsharvin

scarfboy
Mar 4 2010, 09:33 PM
Lennon and Rooney are the only two players that 1) deserve to be in the England squad without question, and 2) can actually perform.
But hold on, Lennon's injured, and hasn't done anything for England.

Actually, he's done less than Walcott in more games.

This silly logic makes me laugh :rofl: :rofl:
Posted Image Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Scarf
Member Avatar
Baby come back
Fulham
Nasri_8
Mar 4 2010, 10:25 PM
scarfboy
Mar 4 2010, 09:33 PM
Lennon and Rooney are the only two players that 1) deserve to be in the England squad without question, and 2) can actually perform.
But hold on, Lennon's injured, and hasn't done anything for England.

Actually, he's done less than Walcott in more games.

This silly logic makes me laugh :rofl: :rofl:
He was one of England's best players in the last World Cup :unsure:

And he's one of best performing English players this season :shrug:

He's injured, yes - but even being injured he's still better than Walcott. His 3 goals against Croatia (which were all excellent finishes) were a long time ago - you have to leave that alone now, and accept he's not good enough for England, and perhaps Arsenal.
----------------
Ricky Villa
 
BAE > BALE

:cry:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Klinsmann18
Member Avatar
Suck Dubs Balls!!

Nasri_8
Mar 4 2010, 10:25 PM
scarfboy
Mar 4 2010, 09:33 PM
Lennon and Rooney are the only two players that 1) deserve to be in the England squad without question, and 2) can actually perform.
But hold on, Lennon's injured, and hasn't done anything for England.

Actually, he's done less than Walcott in more games.

This silly logic makes me laugh :rofl: :rofl:
Not even you could argue that Walcott is better than Lennon.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hwt8a3y28qo
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
miker


D18
Mar 4 2010, 10:32 PM
Nasri_8
Mar 4 2010, 10:25 PM
scarfboy
Mar 4 2010, 09:33 PM
Lennon and Rooney are the only two players that 1) deserve to be in the England squad without question, and 2) can actually perform.
But hold on, Lennon's injured, and hasn't done anything for England.

Actually, he's done less than Walcott in more games.

This silly logic makes me laugh :rofl: :rofl:
Not even you could argue that Walcott is better than Lennon.
You wanna bet he can't?????????
"Stubbornly persist and you will find that the limits of your stubbornness go well beyond the stubbornness of your limits."
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Klinsmann18
Member Avatar
Suck Dubs Balls!!

scarfboy
Mar 4 2010, 10:31 PM
Nasri_8
Mar 4 2010, 10:25 PM
scarfboy
Mar 4 2010, 09:33 PM
Lennon and Rooney are the only two players that 1) deserve to be in the England squad without question, and 2) can actually perform.
But hold on, Lennon's injured, and hasn't done anything for England.

Actually, he's done less than Walcott in more games.

This silly logic makes me laugh :rofl: :rofl:
He was one of England's best players in the last World Cup :unsure:

And he's one of best performing English players this season :shrug:

He's injured, yes - but even being injured he's still better than Walcott. His 3 goals against Croatia (which were all excellent finishes) were a long time ago - you have to leave that alone now, and accept he's not good enough for England, and perhaps Arsenal.
He definitely isn't good enough for Arsenal. All of there players are technically brilliant, Walcott just doesn't fit in at all. He'll do something half decent every now and then which keeps him in the focus of the media. If Franny Jeffers had been given Walcotts game time he would have done better :D
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hwt8a3y28qo
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
issbill
Member Avatar
I was there when Luton won at Wembley (more times than the Gooners)

Mike Parry could
After draw v Yids, Villan quoted

"We were horrible. It was like Watford in the 80s, not at Wimbledon levels, but Watford." Source

Tottenham utterly humiliate Wigan 9-1 - their biggest top-flight win and the second-largest winning margin in Premier League history
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ArieBombarie


Well tbh Waddle I seem to recal was pretty slow you need a football brain then, Walcot is more the airhead wingertype, usefull but not a deciding player
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Tottenham Hotspur · Next Topic »
Add Reply